Proposition of a systematic evaluation of learning for managers formation based on managerial process

Authors

  • Daniel Nascimento e Silva Instituto Federal do Amazonas
  • Chiara da Silva Simões Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Márison Luiz Soares Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • Ana Maria Alves Pereira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/198346595826

Abstract

Managers are the outcomes of production systems rationality designed. The manager as outcome is a mix of knowledge, skills and behavior pattern whose utility is directly proportional to the consistency of your professional formation, just the production systems rationality designed. Thus, this paper aims to present a systematic evaluation of learning based on managerial process functions: planning, organization, directing and control. It consist of ten steps: definition of knowledge to be evaluate; definition of skills to be evaluate; choosing of test framework; writing of questions; definition of test solution norms; evaluation pre-test; testing; organization of data; evaluation of results; and analyzing the causes of failure and replanning. The results show that manager formation process can be optimized if higher education institutions use the system in accordance with the course objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Nascimento e Silva, Instituto Federal do Amazonas

Doutor em Engenharia de Produção

Mestre em Administração

Graduação em Administração

Chiara da Silva Simões, Universidade Luterana do Brasil

Graduada em Pedagogia

Márison Luiz Soares, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Doutor em Engenharia de Produção

Mestre em Engenharia de Produção

Graduado em Administração

Ana Maria Alves Pereira

Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais e Florestais

Graduada em Pedagogia

Published

2013-11-11

How to Cite

Silva, D. N. e, Simões, C. da S., Soares, M. L., & Pereira, A. M. A. (2013). Proposition of a systematic evaluation of learning for managers formation based on managerial process. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 6(4), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.5902/198346595826

Issue

Section

Articles